Latest news | CCI closes case against Intel; Finds no evidence of unfair trading practices

New Delhi, December 3 (PTI) The Competition Commission on Friday closed a four-year-old case against Intel Corporation after concluding that there had been no abuse of dominance by the chipmaker .

“The Commission is of the opinion that no case of violation of the provisions of article 4 of the law by the PO has been established in the present case”, according to the ordinance.

Read also | Xiaomi 11T Pro has reportedly been spotted on the Bluetooth SIG certification site, launching in India soon.

Section 4 of the Competition Act deals with abuse of a dominant position. The opposite part (OP) refers to Intel.

The complaint was brought by Velankani Electronics Pvt Ltd, which designs and manufactures electronic products in India, including servers.

Read also | Oppo Pad tablet with Snapdragon 870 SoC set to debut in India next year: report.

The server has various sub-assemblies such as a processor, a server card, a chassis, a memory disk, among others.

He was looking to make his own server board and make a functioning server, the server board needed to interface with the processor made by Intel.

To make such a compatible server board, it was necessary to access the reference design files and the simulation files of the Intel server boards.

However, according to Velankani, Intel refused to provide such files.

An investigation was carried out in this regard by the investigation service of CCI, the director general (DG), which concluded that Intel had not refused access to any file.

The set of files provided by Intel was sufficient for the informant to develop his server maps, according to the advice of the informant’s own experts.

The CEO noted that the company had access to significant resources prepared by Intel for the design of a server board.

The regulator said that “the Commission is of the opinion that there has been no deliberate denial of a required file (reference design file or simulation file) by the PO to the informant”.

As a result, since Intel did not deny the informant access to the required reference design files and / or simulation files, no abuse of dominance can be attributed to it, according to the order. .

(This is an unedited, auto-generated story from the Syndicated News Feed, the staff at LatestLY may not have edited or edited the body of the content)

Source link

About Margie Peters

Check Also

iPad Pro 2022 – first rumors and what we want to see

We expect there will be a 2022 iPad Pro, given that Apple has revised its …